Balayya’s’s 100th movie, a historical performer Gautami Putra Satakarni coordinated by Krish stole the hearts of all. Indeed, even the two state governments, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, empowered the producers by giving the movie impose exemption.
Everyone hailed the move yet later it brought about debate when AP government headed by Chandra Babu before declined to give assess exception to another recorded performer Rudramadevi featuring Anushka under the bearing of Gunasekhar.
He cried foul and shot the administration for the twofold principles. Amidst this, advocate Adarsh Kumar, recorded a PIL in High Court a year ago against the two governments addressing charge exception and looked to know how it profited the film darlings. He said impose exception to the movies ought to be given to influence individuals to watch the film at bring down ticket cost and not for the advantage of the producers.
High Court which heard the case, sent notification to Telangana and Andhra Pradesh state governments looking for their answer why impose exception ought to be given to profit the makers and by what method can a maker assert assess exclusion and advantages of Entertainment Tax Exemption when individuals paid higher costs to watch the film. The case is posted for next hearing on Aug 16.